Right now, you…
Google their names? LinkedIn. Maybe Facebook. Nothing tells you who'll turn on you. Scan their social? If you have the time. You don't have the time. Call a consultant? For the case that earns it. The rest, you guess. You don't know what you're missing. Until you see what Empath finds.
Google their names?
LinkedIn. Maybe Facebook. Nothing tells you who'll turn on you.
The whole panel
See the panel before you walk in.
Upload the pool. In a day, every juror is scored and mapped to a courtroom seating chart you work from at counsel table. The whole panel, before voir dire even starts.
Ask
Ask in plain English, get the jurors that matter.
Type a question the way you'd ask a colleague. Empath ranks the panel against your exact facts and surfaces the evidence behind every match.
Retired nurse with 22 years of surgical recovery experience at Mercy Hospital. Stated in questionnaire: "Not every bad outcome means someone was negligent."
Deep familiarity with post-surgical complications and hospital procedures from decades of direct patient care experience.
No direct medical background, but questionnaire indicates spouse is a physician assistant at Scripps Memorial.
Volunteers weekly at a community health clinic; comfortable with clinical terminology but no professional medical training.
Scored
Every juror, scored. With the reasons why.
A favorability score against your specific case, a strike-or-keep call, and the bias analysis behind it: the ideological read and case-specific risks. Never a number without a reason.
Susan Park
Recently retired clinical nurse with thirty-two years in pediatrics. Active volunteer with a hospice network.
General Bias Analysis
Settled centrist posture with strong communitarian instincts and a documented preference for evidence-based public-policy framing.
Low general-bias signal — long single-employer career, low-noise civic footprint, and reflective deliberation style across all surfaced contexts.
Case-Specific Biases
Key Patterns
A clinically-trained reader who weighs causation evidence with care. Tracks documentary chains closely; resistant to narrative arguments unmoored from records. The combination favors a methodically-built plaintiff frame over a high-affect one.
Most Influential Factors
- •
Clinical training — sequences medical evidence fluently
- •
Documentation-first orientation — flags any gap in the record
- •
Patient deliberation pace — resistant to emotional framing
Voir Dire Strategic Implications
- •
Probe her comfort with technical medical testimony in detail
- •
Avoid abstract corporate-villain framing — she will discount it
- •
Anchor opening on a clean documentary chain
Bias × Decision-Factor Interaction
Her documentation-first habit compounds her clinical literacy. A defense cross of medical witnesses lands harder than usual; the plaintiff frame must sequence its witnesses with that in mind.
Sourced
Every claim links to its source.
Click any line of the analysis and read the verbatim questionnaire or background record it came from. Every claim ties back to the record.
Patricia Hawkins is a retired surgical-recovery nurse with strong empathy and deep clinical literacy. Her background suggests she weighs medical-causation evidence with unusual care and is resistant to narrative arguments unmoored from the record. As a juror who has personally witnessed the unpredictability of post-surgical outcomes, she is likely to scrutinize any claim of negligence against the documented standard of care. [Juror Questionnaire Responses, chunk 8] Her questionnaire responses corroborate this read across multiple sections.
By nature and lack of medical familiarity, defense counsel may worry she could be swayed by the human story alone — but the record points the other way.
Juror Questionnaire Responses
Juror #3 — Patricia Hawkins. Occupation: Retired. Prior occupation: Registered Nurse. Response to Q12 (medical experience): "I worked in surgical recovery for 22 years at Mercy Hospital. I have seen many post-surgical complications and understand that surgery always carries risks. Not every bad outcome means someone did something wrong."
A security blanket — especially knowing the other side didn't have it.
How much are you missing about your jury?
Pilot pricing for founding firms. Limited seats remaining.
Become a Founding Firm